Category Archives: diary

Referral Lies

This is to prove that Lewisham police knowingly and deliberately lied in a Referral to mental health services.


(See Overview for background summary.)

Having failed to secure a malicious conviction against me/have me sent to prison, Lewisham police then – as part of what I can only call their concerted campaign to discredit me to cover up their own misconduct – maliciously referred me to mental health services.

Lewisham police ‘justified’ Referring me by telling their big fat lie about the CCTV…

the same big fat lie that they had knowingly and deliberately told in a Witness Statement and Case Summary after they maliciously arrested me – ‘verballed’ me – on 02/09/11.

Following that malicious arrest I was charged and forced out of my home for two months on bail conditions imposed because of the lies Lewisham police were telling –

the trial was on 28/10/11, I represented myself at the Court and was mentally competent enough that proceedings were halted half-way through the prosecution case and the District Judge ruled I had “No case to answer” due to “inconsistencies” and “conflicting” police evidence.

So, Lewisham police had failed to secure a malicious conviction against me at Court on Friday 28/10/11…and made the Referral to mental health services on Monday 31/10/11

yet at no time when I had been arrested on 02/09/11 nor when at the police station custody nor when charged/bailed with conditions not to return to my home etc, had I been treated as a mentally ill/mentally vulnerable person –


ie treated as is required by PACE and Govt if police believe arrested person is mentally ill/vulnerable.  (I’ll post the details re this soon.)


This is the Referral – using the big fat lie – made by Lewisham police on 31/10/11 –

(there were other lies in the Referral but this is just to easily prove it was malicious, I continue to ask the Metropolitan Police Service to properly investigate my complaints including all the lies in the Referral)



As above, I have previously posted the proof that Lewisham police were fully aware that it was not that CCTV didn’t support my reports of incidents, they knew that in fact CCTV had not even been retrieved

I’ve also previously posted the proof that PS Duncan Anderson, who made the above Referral on 31/10/11, had attended a meeting on 31/08/11 – ie two months prior to him making the Referral – the minutes for which clearly state that there had been a fault on the CCTV in my home

and PS Duncan Anderson himself had written those minutes!


So, as Lewisham police were fully aware CCTV hadn’t even been retrieved why would they lie about it in a Referral?


Why would they lie to ‘justify’ Referring me?


The only reasonable, only possible, conclusion is that the Referral was entirely malicious…


Lewisham police – having failed to discredit me via a malicious conviction – were now seeking to exploit the stigma of mental health to discredit me and cover-up their serious misconduct.


Lewisham police knowingly and deliberately lying in a Referral was not only a serious injustice and malice towards me, it was also an outrageous  and disgraceful abuse of the MH Referral process.


Further, bearing in mind the Referral was made on 31 October 2011

Lewisham police were also fully aware that my front window had been smashed around 22 September 2011– hardly a ‘delusion’…but they had to lie about that too, to keep covering-up the true situation and their failure to take appropriate action to protect me and my property.

I had made a formal complaint to the Metropolitan Police Service on 10 October 2011 re the failures of Lewisham police to protect me and my property, colluding with Lewisham Council to lie about the CCTV evidence (the big fat lie that both were telling), the malicious arrest, and saying the damage to my window was “wear and tear”…


I was told my complaint could not be investigated until after conclusion of the trial on 28/10/11 – I represented myself at Court and the outcome was “No case to answer” – so the Referral was made at the same time the investigation into my complaint began.


For the record –

PS Anderson claimed in the Referral dated 31/10/11 that I had been in contact with the SNT “for several years now” – well no, since 20 December 2009 so around eighteen months not “several years”…

and the only reason I had been in contact with them for eighteen months was because I was repeatedly targeted by NFH and their associates but Lewisham police refused to uphold the law, refused to take any action to protect me and my property –


which of course actively encouraged the perpetrators to continue their ASB/harassment/ hate, they were getting their sick, perverted pleasure out of it, why stop when they knew there were never any consequences for them.

By the time of the Referral I had suffered/reported around sixty incidents, but Lewisham police were lying about the situation and incidents

PS Anderson also stated in the Referral there was no record of me having been the victim of DV…but I still have a police document from a Data Protection Act request I’d made at the time…

so that’s yet another Lewisham police lie I can prove is a lie.








MG11 lies

This is to prove Lewisham police knowingly and deliberately lied in a Witness Statement.

For the record, I did not want to have to go to the bother of posting any of this here, I have tried and tried going through the proper channels – complaints and IPCC – but to no avail so this – proving on this blog how Lewisham police have lied and treated me in order to be able to counter those who have been covering-up my complaints – was the only option left to me.

Below is the first page of the two page MG11 dated 03/09/11 by PC722 PL Chris Wren of Lewisham Metropolitan Police Service…

PC722 had maliciously arrested me on 02/09/11 – he ‘verballed’ me – and his MG11 was for the purpose of the CPS prosecuting me (note he refers to me in the MG11 as “the defendant”)…

both pages of his MG11 are full of lies, including re the arrest, but my point here is just to easily prove he knowingly and deliberately lied about the situation as regards a repeat victim of ASB/harassment – and lied about evidence – in a Witness Statement

an extremely serious matter which to date the Metropolitan Police Service has covered-up…

I am again asking the Metropolitan Police Service to properly investigate my complaints including fully investigating my evidence and all of his lies.

So, here is that page of the MG11 and below that I explain the lies which deliberately misrepresent me and the true situation, deliberate lies which – along with all the other lies in the rest of his MG11, his Incident Book and Case Summary – can only have been to secure a malicious prosecution against me…to pervert the course of justice.

(I do not know why he has put his statement is 9 pages all signed by him, as I represented myself at court I was given the CPS Prosecution papers, his MG11 is two pages.)

Click on the picture to view


Let’s start with the despicable deliberate lie about the CCTV evidence…

3rd paragraph, 3rd & 4th sentences “Calls to Police and the council continued…CCTV…again failed to produce any evidence regarding her ongoing allegations”

This is the big fat lie both Lewisham police and their “partner” Lewisham Council – with whom they “were working closely together” – were telling to discredit me and cover-up their refusal to take appropriate action to protect me and my property.

Lewisham police were fully aware it was not that CCTV didn’t support my reports of incidents, they knew the truth was that CCTV had not even been retrieved

the only reasonable conclusion is that Lewisham police deliberately lied about it in a Witness Statement in order to completely misrepresent the true situation to secure a malicious prosecution – they were knowingly and deliberately seeking to pervert the course of justice.

Other deliberate lies to completely misrepresent me and the true situation…

2nd paragraph, 2nd sentence “all against the occupants of [gives an address]…”

This lie served the purpose of downplaying the true sitution – where a woman was being repeatedly targeted by a large group of associates – to a ‘neighbour dispute’ type situation –

it was NOT a ‘neighbour dispute’ there had NEVER been any  ‘dispute’.

Lots of documents prove PC722Pl Chris Wren knew full well not “all” my reports were against the NFH living in that address, many were regarding their relatives and numerous associates they had incited against me who lived elsewhere…

he states this lie again in the 3rd paragraph, although as he himself had, after a lot of pressure, eventually arranged the three harassment warnings he refers to, he was of course fully aware that two of these three did NOT live at that address.

3rd paragraph, 1st & 2nd sentences “Police went to great effort…nothing of any evidential value was ever noted”

Why is he telling this lie?  In fact, Lewisham police collected footage for only one incident, this could be easily proven by checking their records which should have been kept for Data Protection Act compliance, and much later I discovered they had lied about what the footage for that one incident showed, which could be checked against contemporaneous evidence I have – see link below


I’ve given links below to the evidence Lewisham police knew the truth – so what they should truthfully and factually have said in the Witness Statement was –

‘we refused to collect CCTV evidence’,

‘Lewisham Council repeatedly ‘lost’ CCTV evidence and we refused her pleas for us to investigate why evidence was being repeatedly ‘lost’,

‘we refused to speak to a witness when she was threatened with violence/death’,

‘at a meeting on 31/08/11 we were told of a fault with the Council CCTV in her home’

From October 2010 up to the date PC722PL Wren wrote his MG11 (ie 03/09/11) Lewisham Council had retreived CCTV footage for only one incident I had reported and that footage they themselves described as “poor quality” and “very poor quality”…


I have previously posted the evidence proving PC722 was fully aware of this and had refused to help me when I sought his assistance re all the ‘lost’ CCTV evidence-





– and of course, there was the meeting on 31/08/11 – ie just two days before he maliciously arrested me – attended by Lewisham police including PC722PL Wren and PS Duncan Anderson, the minutes of which clearly state there was a fault with the Council CCTV which had affected the equipment in my home…see scan of the minutes on link below –


(NB In the 3rd pargraph 5th sentence PC722 refers to Lewisham Council and their audio recording equipment, however, as noted in the Local Government Ombudsman’s report 06/12/12 Lewisham Council had destroyed that audio evidence without telling me and before there could be any independent scrutiny of what had actually been recorded, as the LGO said “This was wrong”.)


3rd paragraph, 6th sentence “but these were solely based on the repeated allegations of the defendant and have no supportive evidence”

Except there was lots of supportive evidence:

– he knew very well that Lewisham Council had ‘lost’ all the evidence there should have been…and he knew that I was reporting incidents and requesting the CCTV footage be retrieved in the belief it would be retrieved…that footage would have been supportive evidence…

– I had filmed one of them causing criminal damage to my car in October 2010, Lewisham police claimed the footage did not show them actually causing the damage but I believe it does, PC Wren had seen this footage – if the Metropolitan Police Service would properly investigate my complaints and actually look at my evidence (rather than ‘just believing’ those officers I complained about) I would be very pleased to show them this footage.

– I’ve previously posted re PC Wren having taken Witness Statements from four neighbours, these statements were taken in the lead up to the harassment warnings being given (16 December 2010), see point 3 on the link below, he clearly states

I have met with some of your neighbours some of whom have agreed to supply statements and have reported similar incidents…

and his email to me 12/12/10 after he had taken the Witness Statements from neighbours –

From: []
Sent: 12 December 2010 12:45
To: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Harassment xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 071210


Just a quick update. I have now collated enough to proceed with harassment warnings for the three discussed….

– PC Wren was also fully aware that from October 2010 to December 2010 – ie during the period leading up to the harassment warnings – I had reported several incidents in the knowledge that an overt Council CCTV camera was in place and in the belief that the footage would be retrieved, eg my email to him 12/12/10 –

From: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 12 December 2010 16:38
To: ‘’ <>
Subject: RE: Harassment xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 071210

Thank you for the updates, I have a couple of queries:

I thought you were typing a statement for me to sign before issuing the warnings, would be grateful if you would advise me re this.

I see from your email you say your Inspector has spoken to Gary Connors, was this about the footage from the camera (which I thought you were going to speak to him about)?

I noticed the company who put up the camera were outside on Friday 10/12/10, presumably collecting the footage of all the incidents to pass to the Council – you might recall I asked about this footage being checked regarding the latest harassment incidents…have you been able to view the footage of the incidents yet?

It subsequently transpired that Lewisham Council had not retrieved the footage for any of the incidents during that period and PC Wren must, of course, have known that – see ‘Lewisham Council CCTV 18/10/10 – 20/12/10’ on the link below-

3rd paragraph, final sentence “After this the allegations dried up…”

Another lie, see link below proving PC Wren was fully aware incidents were continuing and I was reporting them, and far from being “happy with the police action” I told him how “tiring, stressful and upsetting” it was not getting any answers from him –

Bear in mind this is the same PC722 PL Chris Wren who eg refused to speak to the witness to an incident when I was repeatedly threatened with violence/death, and who ludicrously claimed that repeated criminal damage to my property and several threats of violence against me were “very low level ASB at best” – see


The next post will be regarding Lewisham police’s malicious referral to mental health services – using the same big, fat lie about the CCTV as explained above to claim they believed I was mentally ill and suffering delusions incidents were happening…

the referral was made on 31/10/11 which was…

around six weeks after my front window was smashed (c 22/09/11)…

three weeks after I had made a complaint (10/10/11) about how Lewisham police had failed to protect me/my property  and the malicious arrest…

two days after the trial (28/10/11) at which I represented myself and proceeedings were stopped half-way through the prosecution case and it was ruled I had “No case to answer” due to “inconsistencies” in the police evidence…

not to mention that Lewisham police had, they subsequently claimed, been so very concerned my mental health was deteriorating that they waited two months before doing the referral…yes, they claimed they had believed I was mentally ill and suffering delusions incidents were happening several days before I was arrested by PC Wren…

Appropriate Adult anyone?









Criminal damage aka “wear and tear”

Smashed window

When I telephoned the MPS Lewisham Victim Focus dept to find out what was happening regarding this incident I was told it had been closed as wear and tear.

I asked if they could email this information to me and they did, below is an extract from their email.

By the time of this incident I had already reported around 60 (sixty) previous incidents over the previous 22 months.

Around six weeks after this incident – which was reported by the SNT, as at the time I was forced out of my home following Lewisham police maliciously arresting/charging me –

and two days after the Trial at which I had to represent myself and the Trial was stopped and the District Judge ruled I had “No case to answer“…


– the SNT made a referral to a mental health team claiming I was “mentally ill” and suffering “delusions” incidents were happening!


“Dear Ms XXXXX
Once a supervisor read the report he felt there was nothing to suggest this was criminal damage and it could just be wear and tear, therefore unless any other information comes to light, this case was to be closed. …
I hope I have answered all your questions.

Victim Community Support Officer XXXXPL
Victim Focus Unit
Lewisham Police Station
43 Lewisham High Street
SE13 5JZ
ÉMetline 28391
ÉPhone 0208-284-8391″

I had included regarding this incident in my complaint to the MPS, the PS from the Professional Standards dept who was supposed to be investigating my complaint – but who refused to meet with me to discuss my complaint and see my evidence – found no fault at all with Lewisham police putting what was clearly criminal damage as “wear and tear”.


MPS-Complaints and Cover-Ups

The IPCC recently upheld my Appeal re the Metropolitan Police Service did not record my complaint of January 2013, the IPCC instructed MPS to record it.

Yesterday I received an email from the MPS asking me to send them all my evidence to support my complaint – a massive task, there is so much of it – and stating that –

“There is no requirement for me to meet with you and I believe that this would not be appropriate in the circumstances.

The email does not explain WHY it “would not be appropriate in the circumstances” to meet with me to view and discuss my evidence nor what are those “circumstances”.

It seems to me crystal clear, then, that without any contact with me at all and without seeing any of my evidence, the investigator – despite being in the Lewisham ‘Professionalism Unit’ –  has already formed a very negative, hostile opinion of me…

and that opinion is preventing him from objectively, properly and fairly investigating my complaint, which includes serious issues of MPS Lewisham officers disregarding evidence, failing to adhere to MPS standards and making false reports on the police computer.

Is this really what passes as “professionalism” in the Metropolitan Police Service?

Apparently so, because this is now the THIRD time the MPS has refused to meet with me to discuss a complaint and discuss my evidence – this is so obviously unfair, unreasonable and biased, clearly something is very wrong with how I am being treated, and the MPS complaints system.

Had my first complaint been fairly and properly investigated, Lewisham MPS could not have continued treating me as they were, and so I would not have been compelled to make any further complaints….

nor start this blog to show the injustice and evidence.

More details about the unfair, unreasonable and biased way my complaints have been dealt with will be posted soon, with supporting documents as evidence, but briefly –

In October 2011 I made a complaint about the MPS Lewisham/SNT failures to deal with reports of incidents since first reported December 2009, police colluding with Lewisham Council to protect the perpetrators* of incidents, and maliciously arresting/prosecuting me.

* Mainly, a dysfunctional and criminal family, multiple agencies involved with them and “well known to the police” (to quote an SNT officer in the Court).

The MPS investigator, a Sergeant from the MPS Professional Standards Dept, refused to meet with me to discuss my complaint and see my evidence, this despite my repeated requests for her to do so.

I was blamed for her not meeting with me but it was blatantly unfair, not to mention entirely against the IPCC Statutory guidelines…

on one occasion – which was a few days after the very stressful Trial at which the District Judge ruled I had “No case to answer”, and that stress on top of all the stress since incidents started around June 2009, etc –  I had not telephoned her on the day I had said I would, to arrange to meet.  I had not even missed a meeting, just one telephone call.

Without trying to contact me to find out why I had not called, the very next working day she sent a letter saying she was sorry I was unable to give a venue and she had done most of her investigation and felt she could finish it without meeting with me.  When I received her letter I telephoned and explained why I had not been able to call and said I did want to meet with her and show her my evidence – but she just refused.

This officer had met with those I had complained about – and even with Lewisham Council! – but then refused to meet with me, the complainant, to discuss and see my evidence.

Unsurprisingly then, this officer’s  ‘investigation’ fully exonerated the police and her report was full of false information and the officers’ lies, and she referred to an absolutely crucial point which at the very least fully supported, if not actually proved, the arrest/prosecution were malicious, but she completely failed to draw the blatantly obvious conclusion.

When I Appealed to the IPCC explaining all this they did not uphold my Appeal and said I had not co-operated with the investigator – yes, because on one occasion I had not telephoned on the day I said I would the IPCC deemed I had not co-operated!

Not only am I certain any reasonable person would agree that is completely unreasonable and unfair, it was also against the IPCC’s own Statutory Guidance!

As my serious complaint had not been properly and fairly investigated, in order to try to achieve this I made a complaint against the investigator for refusing to meet with me and see my evidence, the MPS refused to record it saying they did not have to, and the IPCC did not uphold my Appeal even though my complaint was about her conduct, I am not sure but I gather as complaint was re conduct should have been recorded.

As if all this was not stressful and upsetting enough, during this time it had transpired that two days after the Trial – at which FIVE police from the Safer Neighbourhood Team were to appear as prosecution witnesses against me (only three did though, because the Trial was stopped), I had had to represent myself,  and the District Judge ruled I had “No case to answer” because of the police ‘inconsistencies’ and ‘conflicting evidence’  – the self-same Safer Neighbourhood Team had made a referral to a mental health team about me falsely claiming I was “mentally ill” and suffering “delusions” incidents were happening.

(Notice they didn’t refer themselves for their “delusions” as shown by their “inconsistencies” and “conflicting evidence” about what happened !)

Not only is there lots of evidence incidents were really happening but the SNT referral was made around six weeks after my front window was smashed…which was reported by the same SNT so clearly NOT a “delusion”…but, ludicrously, the incident was closed as “wear and tear”.

Having obtained (via the Data Protection Act) a copy of that referral I was compelled to make a complaint to correct the malicious, false and damaging claims against me.

I asked for this to be investigated off-borough but request was refused – and lo-and-behold the officer who ‘investigated’ my complaint was the Inspector for the very SNT I was complaining about!

Despite it had been made very clear that I wanted to meet with the investigator to show them my evidence, the Inspector did his ‘investigation’ without contacting me at all – so again this was unfair, unreasonable and biased, I am sure no reasonable person would think it fair to meet with those complained about but not meet with the complainant and see their evidence.

Of course the Inspector’s entirely biased ‘investigation’ completely exonerated the police.  The IPCC refused my Appeal even though the ‘investigation’ was obviously unfair and biased and against their own Statutory Guidance.

These refusals to fairly and properly investigate my complaints enabled MPS Lewisham to continue to refuse to properly deal with my reports of (the further) incidents..and the incidents continued.  

Back in September 2010 I had made a complaint to Lewisham Council about the failures to deal properly with my reports of incidents and the way I was being treated eg not replying, never keeping me informed. This had then gone to the Local Government Ombudsman end-January 2011 but a Final Decision was not made until December 2012.

The LGO – who did discuss my complaint with me and saw much of my evidence for which I am extremely grateful  – found I had been caused “serious injustice” by the faults and failures of Lewisham Council, including all the failures to gather available evidence, including evidence from neighbours also reporting incidents.

As the Metropolitan Police Service were supposed to work closely with Lewisham Council (‘Safer Lewisham Partnership’) regarding ASB and reports of incidents, the LGO finding of “serious injustice” by one of the ‘Partnership’ was obviously very relevant and applicable to the police too, at the very least it meant proper and fair investigation was warranted.

With this independent confirmation of failures to properly deal with my reports of incidents and how I had been treated, I asked my MP – who around nine months previously had written to me stating she would not make any more reply re my “allegations” of anti-social behaviour – to write to the MPS Commissioner.

I provided her with the LGO Recommendations and Final Decision, details of the history and number of incidents, the refusals of the complaint investigators to meet with me, and that the situation continued so a new complaint about the ongoing failures, and she did write to Commissioner Hogan-Howe.

Unfortunately, the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Service was apparently completely UNconcerned that a Member of Parliament was writing to him about his officers’ failures to deal with ASB, this despite the supporting independent findings of the LGO, the high-media profile of ASB, the high number of incidents I had suffered and long period of time they had been going on and were still ongoing, and the refusals to properly and fairly investigate complaints about very serious issues of officers’ conduct.

I subsequently received a letter – which was wrongly addressed to a house along the road! – from the ‘Directorate of Professional Standards’, which stated my complaint would not be recorded because it was “repetitious” and “an abuse of the complaints system”.

I then Appealed to the IPCC pointing out my new complaint covered a different period from the previous complaints, raised new issues, I had email and audio evidence, and I referred to the ‘MPS Misconduct Investigation Guide’  –

2.45.4 Repetitious Complaints.

For a complaint to be regarded as repetitious it must be substantially the same as a previous complaint; there must be no fresh allegations and no fresh evidence. The previous complaint must also have been dealt with properly.”

I feel it is reasonable to expect the Directorate of Professional Services to be aware of the definition of a repetitious complaint but, from the refusal to record, it seems that is not the case.

As stated at the beginning of this post the IPCC upheld my Appeal and told the MPS to record my complaint.  Details of what happens regarding this  complaint will be posted with the ‘diary’ tag.